Based on the Higher Education Quality Assurance Regulation published in the Gazette

Scope

ARTICLE 4 - (1) In this Directive;

conducted by external evaluation organizations that have an evaluation registration certificate.

d) Internal Evaluation: The quality of education, training and research activities and administrative services.

regulates the principles of its work.

Definitions

c) Secretary General: ÿÿrnak University Secretary General,

covers the provisions regarding his work.

institutes,

to be evaluated,

SIRNAK UNIVERSITY QUALITY ASSURANCE DIRECTIVE

ARTICLE 2 - (1) This Directive covers the establishment, duties and responsibilities of the ÿÿrnak University Quality Commission.

a) Academic Unit: Faculty, college, vocational school and university affiliated with ÿÿrnak University.

and institutional quality development activities are carried out by the Quality Commission.

the quality of its activities and administrative services, by the Higher Education Quality Board

Purpose, Scope, Basis and Definitions

Rest

Articles 65 and paragraph (b) of Article 44 and Official Law No. 29423 dated 23.07.2015

b) External Evaluation: The university or a program, education, training and research.

CHAPTER ONE

ARTICLE 3 - (1) This Directive is in accordance with Article 7 and 2547 of the Higher Education Law dated 4/11/1981.

Authorized external evaluators or independent quality assurance recognized by the Council of Higher Education

ARTICLE 1- (1) This Directive covers the establishment, duties and responsibilities of the ÿÿrnak University Quality Commission.

has been prepared.

the evaluation process,

Aim

to set strategic goals and measurable targets, to measure their performance against predetermined

g) Quality Commission Student Representative: ÿÿrnak University student elected according to the principles determined

by the Senate,

the continuous monitoring process,

Establishment of the Quality Commission and its organizational structure

determined by the Senate, not more than one, and from different scientific fields

the commission responsible for the organization and execution of accreditation activities,

to prepare strategic plans with participatory methods and to determine relevant performance indicators

a) The Quality Commission consists of the following members: Multiple members from different academic units

h) Senate: ÿÿrnak University Senate,

CHAPTER TWO

b) Secretary General,

d) Administrative Unit: All administrative units affiliated to the General Secretariat of ÿÿrnak University,

g) Rector: Rector of ÿÿrnak University,

j) University: Refers to ÿÿrnak University.

members

Establishment and Organizational Structure of the Quality Commission, Quality Commission

assurance that it fully complies with compliant quality and performance processes

i) Head of Strategy Development Department: Head of Strategy Development Department of ÿÿrnak University,

To create its mission and vision for the future within the framework of the basic principles it has adopted,

Sirnak University Quality Commission

e) Quality Assurance: Compliance of the university or a program with internal and external quality standards.

i) Strategic Planning: University's development plans, programs, relevant legislation and

Working Procedures and Principles, Duties of the Quality Commission

f) Quality Commission: Quality assessment and assurance studies at the university.

to measure in line with the indicators and to monitor and evaluate this process.

ARTICLE 5 - (1) The Quality Commission consists of the following members:

c) Head of Strategy Development Department,

planned and systematic operations carried out to ensure,

Machine Translated by Google

is determined by.

New members are determined by the Board of Directors. Members whose term of office has expired may be re-elected.

a) A Quality Coordinator is appointed by the Rector from among the members of the Commission for a period of three years.

c) The Commission meets with the absolute majority of the total number of members and the members attending the meeting

c) The Commission's office and personnel support services are provided by the Quality Coordination Department.

In place of the member who has resigned, the Senate shall be elected to complete the remaining term in the same manner.

ARTICLE 6 – (1) The Commission operates in accordance with the following procedures and principles:

is deemed to have been given.

or members who are unable to perform their duties for more than six months due to illness, accident, etc.

Assistant Coordinators may be reassigned using the same procedure.

ARTICLE 7 – (1) The duties of the Quality Commission are as follows:

c) Student representative.

(5) Failure to attend two consecutive meetings within a calendar year without a valid excuse.

Coordinator shall be appointed. The Coordinator shall select a maximum of four assistants. The Coordinator whose term of office has expired and

Duties of the Quality Commission

It meets upon the call of the board or upon the written request of the absolute majority of the board members. Meeting date

It is carried out by the vice-rectors appointed by the rector.

Their memberships will automatically terminate without waiting for the end of the term.

Senate for one year from among students with a grade point average (CGPA) of 3.5 and above

b) The commission meets at least twice in each academic year, otherwise the president or coordinator

(2) The Quality Commission is chaired by the Rector, in the absence of the Rector.

(6) The Student Representative of the Quality Commission is appointed to the General Meeting at the beginning of each academic year.

It is determined by the President.

(4) The term of office of the members determined by the Senate is three years.

Working Procedures and Principles of the Quality Commission

takes decisions by majority. In case of a tie in votes, the decision is made in accordance with the vote of the chairman.

(3) Commission members are announced on the University website.

Machine Translated by Google

Establishment of Quality Coordination

to prepare the annual institutional evaluation report containing the results of its work and

ARTICLE 9 – (1) The duties of the Quality Coordination Office are as follows:

to ensure its dissemination,

to ensure coordination between units,

b) To carry out internal evaluation studies and institutional evaluation and quality development.

Duties of the Quality Coordinator

e) All academic and administrative duties of the University regarding the Quality Coordination Office.

c) To make the necessary preparations for the external evaluation process, in cooperation with the Higher Education Quality Board.

to be provided,

a) Education, training and research in line with the strategic plan and goals of the university.

To submit to the Senate, to ensure that the approved annual institutional evaluation report is published on the University's

website in a way that will enable it to be announced to the public.

a) Determining, implementing and maintaining the processes required for the Quality Management System.

f) To ensure the structuring of the Quality Management System by following the quality standards,

c) To coordinate the University's Strategic Planning and Preparation activities,

to establish the quality assurance system, to determine the institutional indicators and to be carried out within this scope.

Establishment of Quality Coordination, Duties of Quality Coordination

to provide all kinds of support to external evaluation institutions.

b) Reporting on Quality Management System performance and needs for improvement,

Internal and external activities regarding the evaluation and quality improvement of administrative services

CHAPTER THREE

c) Being aware of the concept of student-centeredness in the university and developing this awareness.

to carry out these studies and submit them to the approval of the Senate,

ARTICLE 8 – (1) The Quality Coordination Department consists of the Quality Coordinator, Assistant Quality Coordinators,

office staff and support staff.

d) To conduct relations with external organizations on issues related to the Quality Management System,

studies in accordance with the procedures and principles determined by the Higher Education Quality Board.

Machine Translated by Google

m) To take the necessary measures for external audits.

i) Preparing inputs for the Management Review meeting, holding the meeting,

Cases where no provision exists

ARTICLE 12– (1) The provisions of this Directive are implemented by the Rector.

To ensure that they receive training on their systems and to provide training on the subject,

Final Provisions

j) Determining quality targets and performing target-based performance measurements.

Senate decisions are implemented.

g) Coordinating the meetings with the Quality Representatives of the academic units,

writing down decisions and distributing them to units,

ARTICLE 10 – (1) In cases not covered by this Directive, the relevant legislation provisions and

ARTICLE 11 – (1) This Directive shall enter into force on the date of its approval by the Senate.

l) To ensure the implementation of internal audit activities,

to distribute,

to ensure,

Force

g) To prepare, revise, publish, record and publish documents related to their areas of responsibility.

k) To manage the work of the coordination office,

Executive

i) Quality management of quality representatives, internal auditors, process managers and employees.

CHAPTER FOUR

h) To prepare the quality internal audit plan and to ensure that internal audits are carried out,

Machine Translated by Google